<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unfair Bank Charges UK &#187; battle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/tag/battle/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Banks’ victory in Supreme Court spurs Foxtons to fight fees ruling &#8211; Times Online</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/271/banks%e2%80%99-victory-in-supreme-court-spurs-foxtons-to-fight-fees-ruling-times-online</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/271/banks%e2%80%99-victory-in-supreme-court-spurs-foxtons-to-fight-fees-ruling-times-online#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/271/banks%e2%80%99-victory-in-supreme-court-spurs-foxtons-to-fight-fees-ruling-times-online</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Foxtons is to appeal against a High Court ruling that millions of pounds of fees it has charged landlords are unfair, after the banks’ overdraft charges victory gave the estate agent hope that it could win a renewed legal battle against the Office ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foxtons is to appeal against a High Court ruling that millions of pounds of fees it has charged landlords are unfair, after the banks’ overdraft charges victory gave the estate agent hope that it could win a renewed legal battle against the Office &#8230;</p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/property_and_mortgages/article6967049.ece" title="Banks’ victory in Supreme Court spurs Foxtons to fight fees ruling - Times Online">Banks’ victory in Supreme Court spurs Foxtons to fight fees ruling &#8211; Times Online</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/271/banks%e2%80%99-victory-in-supreme-court-spurs-foxtons-to-fight-fees-ruling-times-online/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OFT vows to continue battle for fairer bank charges despite blow &#8211; Scotsman</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/267/oft-vows-to-continue-battle-for-fairer-bank-charges-despite-blow-scotsman</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/267/oft-vows-to-continue-battle-for-fairer-bank-charges-despite-blow-scotsman#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watchdog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/267/oft-vows-to-continue-battle-for-fairer-bank-charges-despite-blow-scotsman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THE Office of Fair Trading yesterday pledged to continue its fight with banks despite giving up its legal battle on unauthorised overdraft charges. The trading watchdog said it would not be taking any further legal action against the banks over the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE Office of Fair Trading yesterday pledged to continue its fight with banks despite giving up its legal battle on unauthorised overdraft charges. The trading watchdog said it would not be taking any further legal action against the banks over the &#8230;</p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://news.scotsman.com/uk/OFT-vows-to-continue-battle.5933483.jp" title="OFT vows to continue battle for fairer bank charges despite blow - Scotsman">OFT vows to continue battle for fairer bank charges despite blow &#8211; Scotsman</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/267/oft-vows-to-continue-battle-for-fairer-bank-charges-despite-blow-scotsman/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OFT admits defeat on bank charges &#8211; This is Money</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/240/oft-admits-defeat-on-bank-charges-this-is-money</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/240/oft-admits-defeat-on-bank-charges-this-is-money#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/240/oft-admits-defeat-on-bank-charges-this-is-money</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Office of Fair Trading has ended its legal battle to tackle bank charges , despite its belief that the charges remain unfair to customers. Shock: Last months bank charges decision was unexpected. The OFT finally admitted defeat in the battle over ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Office of Fair Trading has ended its legal battle to tackle bank charges , despite its belief that the charges remain unfair to customers. Shock: Last months bank charges decision was unexpected. The OFT finally admitted defeat in the battle over &#8230;</p>
<p>See the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/savings-and-banking/bank-charges/article.html?in_article_id=496369&amp;in_page_id=507&amp;ct=5" title="OFT admits defeat on bank charges - This is Money">OFT admits defeat on bank charges &#8211; This is Money</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/240/oft-admits-defeat-on-bank-charges-this-is-money/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OFT faces new legal fight as builders line up to challenge their fines &#8230; &#8211; Times Online</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/176/oft-faces-new-legal-fight-as-builders-line-up-to-challenge-their-fines-times-online</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/176/oft-faces-new-legal-fight-as-builders-line-up-to-challenge-their-fines-times-online#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/176/oft-faces-new-legal-fight-as-builders-line-up-to-challenge-their-fines-times-online</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) is facing another costly legal battle after 25 construction companies contested penalties imposed by the competition regulator for illegally inflating bids for building tenders. Several of Britain’s biggest ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) is facing another costly legal battle after 25 construction companies contested penalties imposed by the competition regulator for illegally inflating bids for building tenders. Several of Britain’s biggest &#8230;</p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/construction_and_property/article6941646.ece" title="OFT faces new legal fight as builders line up to challenge their fines ... - Times Online">OFT faces new legal fight as builders line up to challenge their fines &#8230; &#8211; Times Online</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/176/oft-faces-new-legal-fight-as-builders-line-up-to-challenge-their-fines-times-online/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debt collectors hit out at advice websites &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/169/debt-collectors-hit-out-at-advice-websites-the-guardian</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/169/debt-collectors-hit-out-at-advice-websites-the-guardian#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/169/debt-collectors-hit-out-at-advice-websites-the-guardian</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... body, but Gander said bank charges would never have been made a priority by the OFT without websites such as his. The OFT launched a high-profile legal battle over the issue, but it ended in defeat last month. "Consumer ... shoplift, consumers ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; body, but Gander said bank charges would never have been made a priority by the OFT without websites such as his. The OFT launched a high-profile legal battle over the issue, but it ended in defeat last month. &#8220;Consumer &#8230; shoplift, consumers &#8230;</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/dec/02/credit-services-association-debt-websites" title="Debt collectors hit out at advice websites - The Guardian">Debt collectors hit out at advice websites &#8211; The Guardian</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/169/debt-collectors-hit-out-at-advice-websites-the-guardian/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The bank charges ruling explained &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/104/the-bank-charges-ruling-explained-the-independent</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/104/the-bank-charges-ruling-explained-the-independent#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/104/the-bank-charges-ruling-explained-the-independent</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In one of its first judgments, the newly-formed Supreme Court has rejected the two year court battle against the banks over unauthorised borrowing fees – charges of up to £38 a time for slipping into the red without permission. They said that the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one of its first judgments, the newly-formed Supreme Court has rejected the two year court battle against the banks over unauthorised borrowing fees – charges of up to £38 a time for slipping into the red without permission. They said that the &#8230;</p>
<p>See the original post here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/money/spend-save/the-bank-charges-ruling-explained-1827327.html" title="The bank charges ruling explained - The Independent">The bank charges ruling explained &#8211; The Independent</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/104/the-bank-charges-ruling-explained-the-independent/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank charges ruling blow for consumers &#8211; Glasgow Evening Times</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/98/bank-charges-ruling-blow-for-consumers-glasgow-evening-times</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/98/bank-charges-ruling-blow-for-consumers-glasgow-evening-times#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thousands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unauthorised]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/98/bank-charges-ruling-blow-for-consumers-glasgow-evening-times</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TENS of thousands of bank customers today lost out in a court battle for refunds over "rip-off" overdraft charges. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of seven major banks and a building society over fees for unauthorised overdrafts. The banks had ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TENS of thousands of bank customers today lost out in a court battle for refunds over &#8220;rip-off&#8221; overdraft charges. The Supreme Court ruled in favour of seven major banks and a building society over fees for unauthorised overdrafts. The banks had &#8230;</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/display.var.2535703.0.0.php" title="Bank charges ruling blow for consumers - Glasgow Evening Times">Bank charges ruling blow for consumers &#8211; Glasgow Evening Times</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/98/bank-charges-ruling-blow-for-consumers-glasgow-evening-times/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banks &#8216;will charge for using cash machines&#8217; &#8211; Daily Mail</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/69/banks-will-charge-for-using-cash-machines-daily-mail</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/69/banks-will-charge-for-using-cash-machines-daily-mail#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaigners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/69/banks-will-charge-for-using-cash-machines-daily-mail</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Banks could charge customers to take out money from a cash machine, campaigners fear. They believe the banks will introduce new 'rip-off' charges if they lose a long-running court battle this week with the Office of Fair Trading. It could signal the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banks could charge customers to take out money from a cash machine, campaigners fear. They believe the banks will introduce new &#8216;rip-off&#8217; charges if they lose a long-running court battle this week with the Office of Fair Trading. It could signal the &#8230;</p>
<p>Originally posted here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1230126/Banks-charge-using-cash-machines.html" title="Banks 'will charge for using cash machines' - Daily Mail">Banks &#8216;will charge for using cash machines&#8217; &#8211; Daily Mail</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/69/banks-will-charge-for-using-cash-machines-daily-mail/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
