<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unfair Bank Charges UK &#187; consumer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/tag/consumer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Atol fund debt falls, clearing way for reform &#8211; Travolution</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/629/atol-fund-debt-falls-clearing-way-for-reform-travolution</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/629/atol-fund-debt-falls-clearing-way-for-reform-travolution#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 10:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holidays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/629/atol-fund-debt-falls-clearing-way-for-reform-travolution</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rise in the charge for consumer protection on package holidays from £1 to £2.50 last October slashed almost £15 million off the debt of the Air Travel Trust fund that pays out when a company fails. The fund ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rise in the charge for consumer protection on package holidays from £1 to £2.50 last October slashed almost £15 million off the debt of the Air Travel Trust fund that pays out when a company fails. The fund &#8230;</p>
<p>See the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.travolution.co.uk/articles/2010/07/06/3702/atol-fund-debt-falls-clearing-way-for-reform.html" title="Atol fund debt falls, clearing way for reform - Travolution">Atol fund debt falls, clearing way for reform &#8211; Travolution</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/629/atol-fund-debt-falls-clearing-way-for-reform-travolution/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cardchoices.co.uk announces new Government reforms on &#8230; &#8211; PRLog (free press release)</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/578/cardchoices-co-uk-announces-new-government-reforms-on-prlog-free-press-release</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/578/cardchoices-co-uk-announces-new-government-reforms-on-prlog-free-press-release#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaigner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/578/cardchoices-co-uk-announces-new-government-reforms-on-prlog-free-press-release</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[uk which allow consumers to compare credit cards easily online also creates a more open market. Marc Gander from Consumer Action Group, a strident campaigner on bank charges, gave a cautious ‘thumbs up’ to the Governments plans, but said ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uk which allow consumers to compare credit cards easily online also creates a more open market. Marc Gander from Consumer Action Group, a strident campaigner on bank charges, gave a cautious ‘thumbs up’ to the Governments plans, but said &#8230;</p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.prlog.org/10724278-cardchoicescouk-announces-new-government-reforms-on-credit-cards.html" title="Cardchoices.co.uk announces new Government reforms on ... - PRLog (free press release)">Cardchoices.co.uk announces new Government reforms on &#8230; &#8211; PRLog (free press release)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/578/cardchoices-co-uk-announces-new-government-reforms-on-prlog-free-press-release/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cardchoices.co.uk announces new Government reforms on &#8230; &#8211; PRLog (free press release)</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/579/cardchoices-co-uk-announces-new-government-reforms-on-prlog-free-press-release-2</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/579/cardchoices-co-uk-announces-new-government-reforms-on-prlog-free-press-release-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaigner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/579/cardchoices-co-uk-announces-new-government-reforms-on-prlog-free-press-release-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[uk which allow consumers to compare credit cards easily online also creates a more open market. Marc Gander from Consumer Action Group, a strident campaigner on bank charges, gave a cautious ‘thumbs up’ to the Governments plans, but said ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uk which allow consumers to compare credit cards easily online also creates a more open market. Marc Gander from Consumer Action Group, a strident campaigner on bank charges, gave a cautious ‘thumbs up’ to the Governments plans, but said &#8230;</p>
<p>More:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.prlog.org/10724278-cardchoicescouk-announces-new-government-reforms-on-credit-cards.html" title="Cardchoices.co.uk announces new Government reforms on ... - PRLog (free press release)">Cardchoices.co.uk announces new Government reforms on &#8230; &#8211; PRLog (free press release)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/579/cardchoices-co-uk-announces-new-government-reforms-on-prlog-free-press-release-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Budget provides Bank Account Benefits for Debt &#8230; &#8211; PR Inside</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/439/the-budget-provides-bank-account-benefits-for-debt-pr-inside</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/439/the-budget-provides-bank-account-benefits-for-debt-pr-inside#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ransom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/439/the-budget-provides-bank-account-benefits-for-debt-pr-inside</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2010-03-31 10:55:39 - One of the UK’s leading providers of consumer debt advice ... purpose, to provide a current account, available to everyone, with no credit checks and a ‘no hidden bank charges’ guarantee. Mike Ransom continued: “The ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2010-03-31 10:55:39 &#8211; One of the UK’s leading providers of consumer debt advice &#8230; purpose, to provide a current account, available to everyone, with no credit checks and a ‘no hidden bank charges’ guarantee. Mike Ransom continued: “The &#8230;</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.pr-inside.com/the-budget-provides-bank-account-benefits-r1806742.htm" title="The Budget provides Bank Account Benefits for Debt ... - PR Inside">The Budget provides Bank Account Benefits for Debt &#8230; &#8211; PR Inside</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/439/the-budget-provides-bank-account-benefits-for-debt-pr-inside/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank overdraft charges face new legal attack &#8211; BBC Business</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/369/bank-overdraft-charges-face-new-legal-attack-bbc-business-2</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/369/bank-overdraft-charges-face-new-legal-attack-bbc-business-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[govan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/369/bank-overdraft-charges-face-new-legal-attack-bbc-business-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In November, the Supreme Court ruled that the scale of bank charges could not be challenged as unfair under consumer contract rules. But a client of the Govan Law Centre has won the right to challenge the Bank of Scotland's overdraft charges under ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In November, the Supreme Court ruled that the scale of bank charges could not be challenged as unfair under consumer contract rules. But a client of the Govan Law Centre has won the right to challenge the Bank of Scotland&#8217;s overdraft charges under &#8230;</p>
<p>Continued here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8528209.stm" title="Bank overdraft charges face new legal attack - BBC Business">Bank overdraft charges face new legal attack &#8211; BBC Business</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/369/bank-overdraft-charges-face-new-legal-attack-bbc-business-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are bank charges a victory for usury? &#8211; This is Money</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/255/are-bank-charges-a-victory-for-usury-this-is-money</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/255/are-bank-charges-a-victory-for-usury-this-is-money#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/255/are-bank-charges-a-victory-for-usury-this-is-money</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the words of the OFT: 'Banks earn around a third of their personal current account revenues from unarranged overdraft charges that are difficult to understand, not transparent and not subject to effective consumer control.' And this leads to the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the words of the OFT: &#8216;Banks earn around a third of their personal current account revenues from unarranged overdraft charges that are difficult to understand, not transparent and not subject to effective consumer control.&#8217; And this leads to the &#8230;</p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/savings-and-banking/bank-charges/article.html?in_article_id=496385&amp;in_page_id=507&amp;ct=5&amp;in_page_id=507&amp;expand=true" title="Are bank charges a victory for usury? - This is Money">Are bank charges a victory for usury? &#8211; This is Money</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/255/are-bank-charges-a-victory-for-usury-this-is-money/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q&amp;A: Bank charges &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/251/qa-bank-charges-the-guardian</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/251/qa-bank-charges-the-guardian#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unauthorised]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/251/qa-bank-charges-the-guardian</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The OFT today announced it was abandoning its legal fight against Britain's banking sector over unauthorised overdraft charges, after the supreme court ruled in favour of the banks last month. Millions of bank customers and consumer groups had been ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The OFT today announced it was abandoning its legal fight against Britain&#8217;s banking sector over unauthorised overdraft charges, after the supreme court ruled in favour of the banks last month. Millions of bank customers and consumer groups had been &#8230;</p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/dec/22/bank-charges-your-rights" title="Q&#038;A: Bank charges - The Guardian">Q&#038;A: Bank charges &#8211; The Guardian</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/251/qa-bank-charges-the-guardian/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Bank charges case is a victory for usury&#8217; &#8211; This is Money</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/253/bank-charges-case-is-a-victory-for-usury-this-is-money</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/253/bank-charges-case-is-a-victory-for-usury-this-is-money#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/253/bank-charges-case-is-a-victory-for-usury-this-is-money</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the words of the OFT: 'Banks earn around a third of their personal current account revenues from unarranged overdraft charges that are difficult to understand, not transparent and not subject to effective consumer control.' And this leads to the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the words of the OFT: &#8216;Banks earn around a third of their personal current account revenues from unarranged overdraft charges that are difficult to understand, not transparent and not subject to effective consumer control.&#8217; And this leads to the &#8230;</p>
<p>View original post here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/savings-and-banking/bank-charges/article.html?in_article_id=496385&amp;in_page_id=507&amp;position=moretopstories" title="'Bank charges case is a victory for usury' - This is Money">&#8216;Bank charges case is a victory for usury&#8217; &#8211; This is Money</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/253/bank-charges-case-is-a-victory-for-usury-this-is-money/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q&amp;A: Bank overdraft charges &#8211; BBC Business</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/274/qa-bank-overdraft-charges-bbc-business</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/274/qa-bank-overdraft-charges-bbc-business#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/274/qa-bank-overdraft-charges-bbc-business</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After nearly three years of trying to use the law to attack the scale of bank charges, the OFT has thrown in the towel. Last month, the Supreme Court told the OFT that it could not use part of the 1999 Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations to ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After nearly three years of trying to use the law to attack the scale of bank charges, the OFT has thrown in the towel. Last month, the Supreme Court told the OFT that it could not use part of the 1999 Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations to &#8230;</p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8426045.stm" title="Q&#038;A: Bank overdraft charges - BBC Business">Q&#038;A: Bank overdraft charges &#8211; BBC Business</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/274/qa-bank-overdraft-charges-bbc-business/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OFT drops unfair bank charges case &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/249/oft-drops-unfair-bank-charges-case-daily-telegraph</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/249/oft-drops-unfair-bank-charges-case-daily-telegraph#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/249/oft-drops-unfair-bank-charges-case-daily-telegraph</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The decision follows last month's Supreme Court ruling that the OFT could not use a part of the unfair consumer contract regulations to decide if bank charges were unfair. The court overturned earlier rulings that the charges, which can be as high as ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The decision follows last month&#8217;s Supreme Court ruling that the OFT could not use a part of the unfair consumer contract regulations to decide if bank charges were unfair. The court overturned earlier rulings that the charges, which can be as high as &#8230;</p>
<p>See more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/6864152/OFT-drops-unfair-bank-charges-case.html" title="OFT drops unfair bank charges case - Daily Telegraph">OFT drops unfair bank charges case &#8211; Daily Telegraph</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/249/oft-drops-unfair-bank-charges-case-daily-telegraph/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
