<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unfair Bank Charges UK &#187; fairness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/tag/fairness/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bank charges challenge is dropped by regulator &#8211; BBC Business</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/262/bank-charges-challenge-is-dropped-by-regulator-bbc-business</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/262/bank-charges-challenge-is-dropped-by-regulator-bbc-business#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/262/bank-charges-challenge-is-dropped-by-regulator-bbc-business</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has decided to drop its investigation into the fairness of bank overdraft charges. It follows last month's Supreme Court ruling that the OFT could not use part of the unfair contract regulations to decide if bank ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has decided to drop its investigation into the fairness of bank overdraft charges. It follows last month&#8217;s Supreme Court ruling that the OFT could not use part of the unfair contract regulations to decide if bank &#8230;</p>
<p>Read more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/homepage/i/int/business/topstories/7/-/news/1/hi/business/8425766.stm" title="Bank charges challenge is dropped by regulator - BBC Business">Bank charges challenge is dropped by regulator &#8211; BBC Business</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/262/bank-charges-challenge-is-dropped-by-regulator-bbc-business/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank charges challenge is dropped by regulator &#8211; BBC Business</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/263/bank-charges-challenge-is-dropped-by-regulator-bbc-business-2</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/263/bank-charges-challenge-is-dropped-by-regulator-bbc-business-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/263/bank-charges-challenge-is-dropped-by-regulator-bbc-business-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has decided to drop its investigation into the fairness of bank overdraft charges. It follows last month's Supreme Court ruling that the OFT could not use part of the unfair contract regulations to decide if bank ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has decided to drop its investigation into the fairness of bank overdraft charges. It follows last month&#8217;s Supreme Court ruling that the OFT could not use part of the unfair contract regulations to decide if bank &#8230;</p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/homepage/i/int/business/topstories/7/-/news/1/hi/business/8425766.stm" title="Bank charges challenge is dropped by regulator - BBC Business">Bank charges challenge is dropped by regulator &#8211; BBC Business</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/263/bank-charges-challenge-is-dropped-by-regulator-bbc-business-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tories: Bank charges move is blow for consumers &#8211; Politics.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/258/tories-bank-charges-move-is-blow-for-consumers-politics-co-uk</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/258/tories-bank-charges-move-is-blow-for-consumers-politics-co-uk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hoban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uncertainty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/258/tories-bank-charges-move-is-blow-for-consumers-politics-co-uk</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservatives' shadow Treasury minister Mark Hoban comments on the Office of Fair Trading's decision to abandon its investigation into bank overdraft charges: "This is a huge blow for consumers. Given the uncertainty about the fairness of charges ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Conservatives&#8217; shadow Treasury minister Mark Hoban comments on the Office of Fair Trading&#8217;s decision to abandon its investigation into bank overdraft charges: &#8220;This is a huge blow for consumers. Given the uncertainty about the fairness of charges &#8230;</p>
<p>See the article here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.politics.co.uk/speakers-corner/issue-of-the-day/economy-and-finance/tories-bank-charges-move-is-blow-for-consumers-$1349003$1348955.htm" title="Tories: Bank charges move is blow for consumers - Politics.co.uk">Tories: Bank charges move is blow for consumers &#8211; Politics.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/258/tories-bank-charges-move-is-blow-for-consumers-politics-co-uk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regulator drops bank charges case &#8211; BBC Business</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/237/regulator-drops-bank-charges-case-bbc-business</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/237/regulator-drops-bank-charges-case-bbc-business#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fingleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/237/regulator-drops-bank-charges-case-bbc-business</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has decided not to take any further court action over the fairness of bank overdraft charges. But Chief Executive of the OFT, John Fingleton, said they have not given up and would like to see banks make a number of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has decided not to take any further court action over the fairness of bank overdraft charges. But Chief Executive of the OFT, John Fingleton, said they have not given up and would like to see banks make a number of &#8230;</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8425905.stm" title="Regulator drops bank charges case - BBC Business">Regulator drops bank charges case &#8211; BBC Business</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/237/regulator-drops-bank-charges-case-bbc-business/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regulator decides on bank overdraft charges test case &#8211; BBC Business</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/233/regulator-decides-on-bank-overdraft-charges-test-case-bbc-business</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/233/regulator-decides-on-bank-overdraft-charges-test-case-bbc-business#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hundreds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thousands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/233/regulator-decides-on-bank-overdraft-charges-test-case-bbc-business</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... test case in July 2007, to decide if the OFT had the powers to rule on the fairness of bank charges. A consumer campaign on the issue had led to hundreds of thousands of complaints which threatened to swamp the UK legal system. But after the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; test case in July 2007, to decide if the OFT had the powers to rule on the fairness of bank charges. A consumer campaign on the issue had led to hundreds of thousands of complaints which threatened to swamp the UK legal system. But after the &#8230;</p>
<p>Originally posted here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8424859.stm" title="Regulator decides on bank overdraft charges test case - BBC Business">Regulator decides on bank overdraft charges test case &#8211; BBC Business</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/233/regulator-decides-on-bank-overdraft-charges-test-case-bbc-business/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regulator decides on bank overdraft charges test case &#8211; BBC Business</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/234/regulator-decides-on-bank-overdraft-charges-test-case-bbc-business-2</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/234/regulator-decides-on-bank-overdraft-charges-test-case-bbc-business-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hundreds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thousands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/234/regulator-decides-on-bank-overdraft-charges-test-case-bbc-business-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... test case in July 2007, to decide if the OFT had the powers to rule on the fairness of bank charges. A consumer campaign on the issue had led to hundreds of thousands of complaints which threatened to swamp the UK legal system. But after the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; test case in July 2007, to decide if the OFT had the powers to rule on the fairness of bank charges. A consumer campaign on the issue had led to hundreds of thousands of complaints which threatened to swamp the UK legal system. But after the &#8230;</p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8424859.stm" title="Regulator decides on bank overdraft charges test case - BBC Business">Regulator decides on bank overdraft charges test case &#8211; BBC Business</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/234/regulator-decides-on-bank-overdraft-charges-test-case-bbc-business-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Capital Connect wins Scrooge of the Year 2009 &#8211; Times Online</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/226/first-capital-connect-wins-scrooge-of-the-year-2009-times-online</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/226/first-capital-connect-wins-scrooge-of-the-year-2009-times-online#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grievance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/226/first-capital-connect-wins-scrooge-of-the-year-2009-times-online</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[uk, a website pushing for change, says that the award is ... s grievance followed the Supreme Court ruling that the Office of Fair Trading cannot investigate the fairness of bank charges. He wrote: “I nominate the banks, for holding on to the money ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uk, a website pushing for change, says that the award is &#8230; s grievance followed the Supreme Court ruling that the Office of Fair Trading cannot investigate the fairness of bank charges. He wrote: “I nominate the banks, for holding on to the money &#8230;</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/consumer_affairs/article6961950.ece" title="First Capital Connect wins Scrooge of the Year 2009 - Times Online">First Capital Connect wins Scrooge of the Year 2009 &#8211; Times Online</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/226/first-capital-connect-wins-scrooge-of-the-year-2009-times-online/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank charges case will mean better deals for us &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/143/bank-charges-case-will-mean-better-deals-for-us-the-independent</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/143/bank-charges-case-will-mean-better-deals-for-us-the-independent#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/143/bank-charges-case-will-mean-better-deals-for-us-the-independent</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The estimated one million or so customers expecting a tasty handout from their bank following the charges court case will now have to think again, after the Supreme Court refused the Office of Fair Trading permission to judge on the fairness of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The estimated one million or so customers expecting a tasty handout from their bank following the charges court case will now have to think again, after the Supreme Court refused the Office of Fair Trading permission to judge on the fairness of &#8230;</p>
<p>See more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/money/loans-credit/bank-charges-case-will-mean-better-deals-for-us-1829469.html" title="Bank charges case will mean better deals for us - The Independent">Bank charges case will mean better deals for us &#8211; The Independent</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/143/bank-charges-case-will-mean-better-deals-for-us-the-independent/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank charges case will mean better deals for us &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/144/bank-charges-case-will-mean-better-deals-for-us-the-independent-2</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/144/bank-charges-case-will-mean-better-deals-for-us-the-independent-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/144/bank-charges-case-will-mean-better-deals-for-us-the-independent-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The estimated one million or so customers expecting a tasty handout from their bank following the charges court case will now have to think again, after the Supreme Court refused the Office of Fair Trading permission to judge on the fairness of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The estimated one million or so customers expecting a tasty handout from their bank following the charges court case will now have to think again, after the Supreme Court refused the Office of Fair Trading permission to judge on the fairness of &#8230;</p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/money/loans-credit/bank-charges-case-will-mean-better-deals-for-us-1829469.html" title="Bank charges case will mean better deals for us - The Independent">Bank charges case will mean better deals for us &#8211; The Independent</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/144/bank-charges-case-will-mean-better-deals-for-us-the-independent-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank Charges: Cartel Bank Charges Claims Unaffected By Supreme Court &#8230; &#8211; PRLog (free press release)</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/138/bank-charges-cartel-bank-charges-claims-unaffected-by-supreme-court-prlog-free-press-release</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/138/bank-charges-cartel-bank-charges-claims-unaffected-by-supreme-court-prlog-free-press-release#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unpopular]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/138/bank-charges-cartel-bank-charges-claims-unaffected-by-supreme-court-prlog-free-press-release</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PR Log (Press Release) – Nov 27, 2009 – “Following the shocking and universally unpopular decision by The Supreme Court regarding their ruling that bank charges do not have to be assessed for fairness, it is our belief that the Judgment will ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PR Log (Press Release) – Nov 27, 2009 – “Following the shocking and universally unpopular decision by The Supreme Court regarding their ruling that bank charges do not have to be assessed for fairness, it is our belief that the Judgment will &#8230;</p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.prlog.org/10430253-bank-charges-cartel-bank-charges-claims-unaffected-by-supreme-court-judgment.html" title="Bank Charges: Cartel Bank Charges Claims Unaffected By Supreme Court ... - PRLog (free press release)">Bank Charges: Cartel Bank Charges Claims Unaffected By Supreme Court &#8230; &#8211; PRLog (free press release)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/138/bank-charges-cartel-bank-charges-claims-unaffected-by-supreme-court-prlog-free-press-release/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
