<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unfair Bank Charges UK &#187; favour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/tag/favour/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Q&amp;A: Bank charges &#8211; The Guardian</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/251/qa-bank-charges-the-guardian</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/251/qa-bank-charges-the-guardian#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unauthorised]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/251/qa-bank-charges-the-guardian</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The OFT today announced it was abandoning its legal fight against Britain's banking sector over unauthorised overdraft charges, after the supreme court ruled in favour of the banks last month. Millions of bank customers and consumer groups had been ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The OFT today announced it was abandoning its legal fight against Britain&#8217;s banking sector over unauthorised overdraft charges, after the supreme court ruled in favour of the banks last month. Millions of bank customers and consumer groups had been &#8230;</p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2009/dec/22/bank-charges-your-rights" title="Q&#038;A: Bank charges - The Guardian">Q&#038;A: Bank charges &#8211; The Guardian</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/251/qa-bank-charges-the-guardian/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broker offers hope on unfair bank charges &#8211; This is Money</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/228/broker-offers-hope-on-unfair-bank-charges-this-is-money</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/228/broker-offers-hope-on-unfair-bank-charges-this-is-money#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/228/broker-offers-hope-on-unfair-bank-charges-this-is-money</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With hopes of reclaiming costly overdraft charges seemingly dead in the water after the surprise Supreme Court decision last month in favour of the banks, one firm is claiming that it can still help businesses get their money back]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With hopes of reclaiming costly overdraft charges seemingly dead in the water after the surprise Supreme Court decision last month in favour of the banks, one firm is claiming that it can still help businesses get their money back</p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/work/small-business/article.html?in_article_id=496327&amp;in_page_id=10&amp;position=moretopstories" title="Broker offers hope on unfair bank charges - This is Money">Broker offers hope on unfair bank charges &#8211; This is Money</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/228/broker-offers-hope-on-unfair-bank-charges-this-is-money/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which?: Bank charges ruling will affect us all &#8211; This is Money</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/189/which-bank-charges-ruling-will-affect-us-all-this-is-money</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/189/which-bank-charges-ruling-will-affect-us-all-this-is-money#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suppliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vicary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/189/which-bank-charges-ruling-will-affect-us-all-this-is-money</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those who don't go into the red may not think the bank charges ruling in favour of the banks affects them, but consumer group Which? says without a change in the law it could mean your energy suppliers or shops start squeezing consumers. Peter Vicary ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who don&#8217;t go into the red may not think the bank charges ruling in favour of the banks affects them, but consumer group Which? says without a change in the law it could mean your energy suppliers or shops start squeezing consumers. Peter Vicary &#8230;</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/savings-and-banking/bank-charges/article.html?in_article_id=495506&amp;in_page_id=507&amp;position=moretopstories" title="Which?: Bank charges ruling will affect us all - This is Money">Which?: Bank charges ruling will affect us all &#8211; This is Money</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/189/which-bank-charges-ruling-will-affect-us-all-this-is-money/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which?: Bank charges ruling will affect us all &#8211; This is Money</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/190/which-bank-charges-ruling-will-affect-us-all-this-is-money-2</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/190/which-bank-charges-ruling-will-affect-us-all-this-is-money-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suppliers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/190/which-bank-charges-ruling-will-affect-us-all-this-is-money-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those who don't go into the red may not think the bank charges ruling in favour of the banks affects them, but consumer group Which? says without a change in the law it could mean your energy suppliers or shops start squeezing consumers. Peter Vicary ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who don&#8217;t go into the red may not think the bank charges ruling in favour of the banks affects them, but consumer group Which? says without a change in the law it could mean your energy suppliers or shops start squeezing consumers. Peter Vicary &#8230;</p>
<p>Read the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/savings-and-banking/bank-charges/article.html?in_article_id=495506&amp;in_page_id=507&amp;position=moretopstories" title="Which?: Bank charges ruling will affect us all - This is Money">Which?: Bank charges ruling will affect us all &#8211; This is Money</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/190/which-bank-charges-ruling-will-affect-us-all-this-is-money-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Counter charge: Switch banks to suit your life &#8211; Daily Mirror</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/166/counter-charge-switch-banks-to-suit-your-life-daily-mirror</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/166/counter-charge-switch-banks-to-suit-your-life-daily-mirror#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/166/counter-charge-switch-banks-to-suit-your-life-daily-mirror</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The banks may still be celebrating after the Supreme Court ruled in their favour over unfair charges last week. But it’s a hollow victory... The battle still rages as customers, politicians and the Office of Fair Trading line up to pressure banks ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The banks may still be celebrating after the Supreme Court ruled in their favour over unfair charges last week. But it’s a hollow victory&#8230; The battle still rages as customers, politicians and the Office of Fair Trading line up to pressure banks &#8230;</p>
<p>Read more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/advice/money/2009/12/02/counter-charge-switch-banks-to-suit-your-life-115875-21865727/" title="Counter charge: Switch banks to suit your life - Daily Mirror">Counter charge: Switch banks to suit your life &#8211; Daily Mirror</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/166/counter-charge-switch-banks-to-suit-your-life-daily-mirror/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle against bank charges not over yet &#8211; The Independent</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/152/battle-against-bank-charges-not-over-yet-the-independent</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/152/battle-against-bank-charges-not-over-yet-the-independent#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crushing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/152/battle-against-bank-charges-not-over-yet-the-independent</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Millions of consumers were dealt a crushing blow last week when the Supreme Court ruled in favour of the banks in the legal battle between the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and eight high street banking institutions over the issue of unfair charges ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Millions of consumers were dealt a crushing blow last week when the Supreme Court ruled in favour of the banks in the legal battle between the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and eight high street banking institutions over the issue of unfair charges &#8230;</p>
<p>Originally posted here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/money/spend-save/battle-against-bank-charges-not-over-yet-1830376.html" title="Battle against bank charges not over yet - The Independent">Battle against bank charges not over yet &#8211; The Independent</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/152/battle-against-bank-charges-not-over-yet-the-independent/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank charges: Court decision impact &#8211; This is Money</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/151/bank-charges-court-decision-impact-this-is-money</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/151/bank-charges-court-decision-impact-this-is-money#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unauthorised]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/151/bank-charges-court-decision-impact-this-is-money</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People hoping for a refund of unauthorised overdraft charges were dealt a surprise blow last week when the Supreme Court ruled in favour of the banks. It means the case, which had been brought by the Office of Fair Trading, has stalled. The OFT ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People hoping for a refund of unauthorised overdraft charges were dealt a surprise blow last week when the Supreme Court ruled in favour of the banks. It means the case, which had been brought by the Office of Fair Trading, has stalled. The OFT &#8230;</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/savings-and-banking/bank-charges/article.html?in_article_id=495019&amp;in_page_id=507&amp;ct=5" title="Bank charges: Court decision impact - This is Money">Bank charges: Court decision impact &#8211; This is Money</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/151/bank-charges-court-decision-impact-this-is-money/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which: A bitter blow &#8211; Politics.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/128/which-a-bitter-blow-politics-co-uk</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/128/which-a-bitter-blow-politics-co-uk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdrafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/128/which-a-bitter-blow-politics-co-uk</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[comments on the Supreme Court ruling in favour of banks charging fees on unauthorised overdrafts: "This is a bitter blow for the millions of people who have been patiently waiting to get their bank charges back. Not only does it give banks licence to ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>comments on the Supreme Court ruling in favour of banks charging fees on unauthorised overdrafts: &#8220;This is a bitter blow for the millions of people who have been patiently waiting to get their bank charges back. Not only does it give banks licence to &#8230;</p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.politics.co.uk/speakers-corner/issue-of-the-day/which-a-bitter-blow-$1343034$1343027.htm" title="Which: A bitter blow - Politics.co.uk">Which: A bitter blow &#8211; Politics.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/128/which-a-bitter-blow-politics-co-uk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court rules in favour of banks &#8211; Skynews.com</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/124/supreme-court-rules-in-favour-of-banks-skynews-com</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/124/supreme-court-rules-in-favour-of-banks-skynews-com#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/124/supreme-court-rules-in-favour-of-banks-skynews-com</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Britain's Supreme Court ruled in favour of banks on Wednesday in a test case triggered by consumers demanding relief for steep overdraft charges. The court ruled that the charges should not be subject to regulation by a government agency, the Office ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britain&#8217;s Supreme Court ruled in favour of banks on Wednesday in a test case triggered by consumers demanding relief for steep overdraft charges. The court ruled that the charges should not be subject to regulation by a government agency, the Office &#8230;</p>
<p>Follow this link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.skynews.com.au/finance/article.aspx?id=398602" title="Supreme Court rules in favour of banks - Skynews.com">Supreme Court rules in favour of banks &#8211; Skynews.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/124/supreme-court-rules-in-favour-of-banks-skynews-com/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ken Clarke and Jacqui Smith on bank charges &#8211; BBC News</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/106/ken-clarke-and-jacqui-smith-on-bank-charges-bbc-news-2</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/106/ken-clarke-and-jacqui-smith-on-bank-charges-bbc-news-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attempts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jacqui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/106/ken-clarke-and-jacqui-smith-on-bank-charges-bbc-news-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shadow Business Secretary Ken Clarke and former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith on the Supreme Court ruling in favour of seven banks and a building society who were fighting attempts to force them to pay back billions of pounds in overdraft charges. The ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shadow Business Secretary Ken Clarke and former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith on the Supreme Court ruling in favour of seven banks and a building society who were fighting attempts to force them to pay back billions of pounds in overdraft charges. The &#8230;</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/the_daily_politics/8378548.stm" title="Ken Clarke and Jacqui Smith on bank charges - BBC News">Ken Clarke and Jacqui Smith on bank charges &#8211; BBC News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/106/ken-clarke-and-jacqui-smith-on-bank-charges-bbc-news-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
