<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unfair Bank Charges UK &#187; ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/tag/ruling/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Banks’ victory in Supreme Court spurs Foxtons to fight fees ruling &#8211; Times Online</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/271/banks%e2%80%99-victory-in-supreme-court-spurs-foxtons-to-fight-fees-ruling-times-online</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/271/banks%e2%80%99-victory-in-supreme-court-spurs-foxtons-to-fight-fees-ruling-times-online#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/271/banks%e2%80%99-victory-in-supreme-court-spurs-foxtons-to-fight-fees-ruling-times-online</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Foxtons is to appeal against a High Court ruling that millions of pounds of fees it has charged landlords are unfair, after the banks’ overdraft charges victory gave the estate agent hope that it could win a renewed legal battle against the Office ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foxtons is to appeal against a High Court ruling that millions of pounds of fees it has charged landlords are unfair, after the banks’ overdraft charges victory gave the estate agent hope that it could win a renewed legal battle against the Office &#8230;</p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/property_and_mortgages/article6967049.ece" title="Banks’ victory in Supreme Court spurs Foxtons to fight fees ruling - Times Online">Banks’ victory in Supreme Court spurs Foxtons to fight fees ruling &#8211; Times Online</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/271/banks%e2%80%99-victory-in-supreme-court-spurs-foxtons-to-fight-fees-ruling-times-online/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank charges challenge is dropped by regulator &#8211; BBC Business</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/262/bank-charges-challenge-is-dropped-by-regulator-bbc-business</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/262/bank-charges-challenge-is-dropped-by-regulator-bbc-business#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/262/bank-charges-challenge-is-dropped-by-regulator-bbc-business</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has decided to drop its investigation into the fairness of bank overdraft charges. It follows last month's Supreme Court ruling that the OFT could not use part of the unfair contract regulations to decide if bank ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has decided to drop its investigation into the fairness of bank overdraft charges. It follows last month&#8217;s Supreme Court ruling that the OFT could not use part of the unfair contract regulations to decide if bank &#8230;</p>
<p>Read more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/homepage/i/int/business/topstories/7/-/news/1/hi/business/8425766.stm" title="Bank charges challenge is dropped by regulator - BBC Business">Bank charges challenge is dropped by regulator &#8211; BBC Business</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/262/bank-charges-challenge-is-dropped-by-regulator-bbc-business/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watchdog drops bank charges action &#8211; Metro.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/259/watchdog-drops-bank-charges-action-metro-co-uk</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/259/watchdog-drops-bank-charges-action-metro-co-uk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundamental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/259/watchdog-drops-bank-charges-action-metro-co-uk</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The regulator's decision, which follows a Supreme Court ruling that the issue does not come under its remit, will come as a blow to consumers hoping to claim back the charges. But the OFT said it still believed "fundamental changes" were needed to ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The regulator&#8217;s decision, which follows a Supreme Court ruling that the issue does not come under its remit, will come as a blow to consumers hoping to claim back the charges. But the OFT said it still believed &#8220;fundamental changes&#8221; were needed to &#8230;</p>
<p>Read this article:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.metro.co.uk/news/806946-watchdog-drops-bank-charges-action" title="Watchdog drops bank charges action - Metro.co.uk">Watchdog drops bank charges action &#8211; Metro.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/259/watchdog-drops-bank-charges-action-metro-co-uk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OFT drops unfair bank charges case &#8211; Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/249/oft-drops-unfair-bank-charges-case-daily-telegraph</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/249/oft-drops-unfair-bank-charges-case-daily-telegraph#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/249/oft-drops-unfair-bank-charges-case-daily-telegraph</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The decision follows last month's Supreme Court ruling that the OFT could not use a part of the unfair consumer contract regulations to decide if bank charges were unfair. The court overturned earlier rulings that the charges, which can be as high as ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The decision follows last month&#8217;s Supreme Court ruling that the OFT could not use a part of the unfair consumer contract regulations to decide if bank charges were unfair. The court overturned earlier rulings that the charges, which can be as high as &#8230;</p>
<p>See more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/6864152/OFT-drops-unfair-bank-charges-case.html" title="OFT drops unfair bank charges case - Daily Telegraph">OFT drops unfair bank charges case &#8211; Daily Telegraph</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/249/oft-drops-unfair-bank-charges-case-daily-telegraph/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Capital Connect wins Scrooge of the Year 2009 &#8211; Times Online</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/226/first-capital-connect-wins-scrooge-of-the-year-2009-times-online</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/226/first-capital-connect-wins-scrooge-of-the-year-2009-times-online#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grievance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/226/first-capital-connect-wins-scrooge-of-the-year-2009-times-online</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[uk, a website pushing for change, says that the award is ... s grievance followed the Supreme Court ruling that the Office of Fair Trading cannot investigate the fairness of bank charges. He wrote: “I nominate the banks, for holding on to the money ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uk, a website pushing for change, says that the award is &#8230; s grievance followed the Supreme Court ruling that the Office of Fair Trading cannot investigate the fairness of bank charges. He wrote: “I nominate the banks, for holding on to the money &#8230;</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/consumer_affairs/article6961950.ece" title="First Capital Connect wins Scrooge of the Year 2009 - Times Online">First Capital Connect wins Scrooge of the Year 2009 &#8211; Times Online</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/226/first-capital-connect-wins-scrooge-of-the-year-2009-times-online/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City Diaries: Should we challenge bank charges? &#8211; BBC Business</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/185/city-diaries-should-we-challenge-bank-charges-bbc-business</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/185/city-diaries-should-we-challenge-bank-charges-bbc-business#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appointment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[queen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/185/city-diaries-should-we-challenge-bank-charges-bbc-business</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week our City Diarists discuss the Supreme Court ruling on bank charges, the appointment of the new EU Internal Markets Commissioner, and the banker's reaction to the Queen's speech. These diaries are written by people who work in finance and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week our City Diarists discuss the Supreme Court ruling on bank charges, the appointment of the new EU Internal Markets Commissioner, and the banker&#8217;s reaction to the Queen&#8217;s speech. These diaries are written by people who work in finance and &#8230;</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8393889.stm" title="City Diaries: Should we challenge bank charges? - BBC Business">City Diaries: Should we challenge bank charges? &#8211; BBC Business</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/185/city-diaries-should-we-challenge-bank-charges-bbc-business/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City Diaries: Should we challenge bank charges? &#8211; BBC Business</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/186/city-diaries-should-we-challenge-bank-charges-bbc-business-2</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/186/city-diaries-should-we-challenge-bank-charges-bbc-business-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appointment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/186/city-diaries-should-we-challenge-bank-charges-bbc-business-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week our City Diarists discuss the Supreme Court ruling on bank charges, the appointment of the new EU Internal Markets Commissioner, and the banker's reaction to the Queen's speech. These diaries are written by people who work in finance and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week our City Diarists discuss the Supreme Court ruling on bank charges, the appointment of the new EU Internal Markets Commissioner, and the banker&#8217;s reaction to the Queen&#8217;s speech. These diaries are written by people who work in finance and &#8230;</p>
<p>Originally posted here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8393889.stm" title="City Diaries: Should we challenge bank charges? - BBC Business">City Diaries: Should we challenge bank charges? &#8211; BBC Business</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/186/city-diaries-should-we-challenge-bank-charges-bbc-business-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Lloyds cancelling bank charge claims? &#8211; This is Money</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/164/is-lloyds-cancelling-bank-charge-claims-this-is-money-2</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/164/is-lloyds-cancelling-bank-charge-claims-this-is-money-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lloyds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/164/is-lloyds-cancelling-bank-charge-claims-this-is-money-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I that Lloyds Banking Group is contacting the County Courts and asking them to throw out all its bank charge claims after the Supreme Court ruling on bank charges last week. Fast mover: Lloyds has said it will only act along with the other banks ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I that Lloyds Banking Group is contacting the County Courts and asking them to throw out all its bank charge claims after the Supreme Court ruling on bank charges last week. Fast mover: Lloyds has said it will only act along with the other banks &#8230;</p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/savings-and-banking/ask-an-expert/article.html?in_article_id=495145&amp;in_page_id=111&amp;expand=true" title="Is Lloyds cancelling bank charge claims? - This is Money">Is Lloyds cancelling bank charge claims? &#8211; This is Money</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/164/is-lloyds-cancelling-bank-charge-claims-this-is-money-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moore: Ministers must act on unfair bank charges &#8211; Politics.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/161/moore-ministers-must-act-on-unfair-bank-charges-politics-co-uk</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/161/moore-ministers-must-act-on-unfair-bank-charges-politics-co-uk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/161/moore-ministers-must-act-on-unfair-bank-charges-politics-co-uk</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Local MP Michael Moore has called on Ministers to force banks to offer people in the Borders a better deal after last week’s Supreme Court ruling that will prevent customers from appealing against unauthorised overdraft charges. The court found ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Local MP Michael Moore has called on Ministers to force banks to offer people in the Borders a better deal after last week’s Supreme Court ruling that will prevent customers from appealing against unauthorised overdraft charges. The court found &#8230;</p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.politics.co.uk/mps/press-releases/party-politics/liberal-democrats/moore-ministers-must-act-on-unfair-bank-charges-$1344431.htm" title="Moore: Ministers must act on unfair bank charges - Politics.co.uk">Moore: Ministers must act on unfair bank charges &#8211; Politics.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/161/moore-ministers-must-act-on-unfair-bank-charges-politics-co-uk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moore: Ministers must act on unfair bank charges &#8211; Politics.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/162/moore-ministers-must-act-on-unfair-bank-charges-politics-co-uk-2</link>
		<comments>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/162/moore-ministers-must-act-on-unfair-bank-charges-politics-co-uk-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UFBC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bank Charges News Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overdraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reclaiming bank charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/162/moore-ministers-must-act-on-unfair-bank-charges-politics-co-uk-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Local MP Michael Moore has called on Ministers to force banks to offer people in the Borders a better deal after last week’s Supreme Court ruling that will prevent customers from appealing against unauthorised overdraft charges. The court found ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Local MP Michael Moore has called on Ministers to force banks to offer people in the Borders a better deal after last week’s Supreme Court ruling that will prevent customers from appealing against unauthorised overdraft charges. The court found &#8230;</p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.politics.co.uk/mps/press-releases/party-politics/liberal-democrats/moore-ministers-must-act-on-unfair-bank-charges-$1344431.htm" title="Moore: Ministers must act on unfair bank charges - Politics.co.uk">Moore: Ministers must act on unfair bank charges &#8211; Politics.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unfairbankcharges.org.uk/162/moore-ministers-must-act-on-unfair-bank-charges-politics-co-uk-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
